Disentangling the biogeographical origins of threatened species of the Macaronesian bryophythe flora
Fecha
2020Resumen
Historical biogeographic knowledge of island colonization is unevenly spread across
insular regions and taxonomic groups. While in the case of vascular plants, the
biogeographical origins of a limited number of insular floras are relatively well known,
there is still a long way to go to reach a similar knowledge for insular bryophyte floras.
Most of this knowledge is highly concentrated in a few archipelagos distributed across
the Northeastern Atlantic Ocean, a region known as Macaronesia. The Macaronesian
bryophyte flora has been thus object of a number of publications focussing on
phylogenetic and biogeographic aspects, but aspects such as the geographic origins of
its bryophyte flora remains largely unknown. This contrast with the case of the
Macaronesian angiosperm flora, for which there is mounting evidence that the main
species pools are inferred to have been in the Mediterrean and northern regions in
Europe. In the present Master Thesis, we implement an integrative biogeographical
quantitative-approach in order to improve our understanding on the evolutionary
origins and post-colonization diversification events of the Macaronesian bryophyte
flora. Specifically, we target species groups that include threatened bryophyte taxa,
which have been analysed in BEAST and BioGeoBEARS in order to estimate their
colonization and divergence times and their ancestral areas, respectively. Our results
support the role of the Macaronesian archipelagos as a crossroad for bryophyte species
pools from different geographic origins, with a principal influence of Palearctic, Nearctic
and Neotropical regions. The dating approach also provides preliminary evidence for the
apparent predominance of neoendemic species in detriment of palaeoendemic species,
which departs from previous hypotheses on the origins of the Macaronesian flora, in
particular for species associated with the different types of the laurel forest. The
implications of our findings for island plant conservation are discussed.