Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Fernández, Agustín 
dc.contributor.authorAlcoba Florez, Julia
dc.contributor.authorGil Campesino, Helena
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Martínez de Artola, Diego
dc.contributor.authorDíez Gil, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Montelongo, Rafaela
dc.contributor.authorCiuffreda, Laura
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Carlos
dc.contributor.otherMedicina Física y Farmacología
dc.contributor.otherGrupo "inmunología Celular y Viral".
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T21:08:08Z
dc.date.available2024-01-15T21:08:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/35347
dc.descriptionmedRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.24.20218685; this version posted October 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Limited testing capacity has characterized the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, hampering a timely control of outbreaks and the possibilities to reduce the escalation of community transmissions. Here we investigated the potential of using pooling of samples followed by one-step retrotranscription and quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to increase SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity. Methods: We first evaluated different sample pooling (1:5, 1:10 and 1:15) prior to RNA extractions followed by standard RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 diagnosis. The pool size achieving reproducible results in independent tests was then used for assessing nasopharyngeal samples in a tertiary hospital during August 2020. Results: We found that pool size of five samples achieved the highest sensitivity compared to pool sizes of 10 and 15, showing a mean (± SD) Ct shift of 3.5 ± 2.2 between the pooled test and positive samples in the pool. We then used a pool size of five to test a total of 895 pools (4,475 prospective samples) using two different RTqPCR kits available at that time. The Real Accurate Quadruplex corona-plus PCR Kit (PathoFinder) reported the lowest mean Ct (± SD) shift (2.2 ± 2.4) among the pool and the individual samples. The strategy allows detecting individual samples in the positive pools with Cts in the range of 16.7-39.4. Conclusions: We found that pools of five samples combined with RT-qPCR solutions helped to increase SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity with minimal loss of sensitivity compared to that resulting from testing the samples independently.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.titleIncreasing SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR testing capacity by sample pooling.en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/2020.10.24.20218685
dc.subject.keywordCOVID-19en
dc.subject.keywordSARS-CoV-2en
dc.subject.keywordtesting capacityen
dc.subject.keywordscalabilityen
dc.subject.keywordsample poolingen


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)