Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuárez Llanos, José Pablo
dc.contributor.authorMora Mendoza, Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorBenítez Brito, Néstor
dc.contributor.authorPérez Méndez, Lina
dc.contributor.authorPereyra-García Castro, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorOliva García, José Gregorio
dc.contributor.authorPalacio Abizanda, José Enrique
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T21:06:45Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T21:06:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1734-1922
dc.identifier.urihttp://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/36133
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: There is no gold-standard method for hospital nutrition screening. The new screening tool termed Control of Food Intake, Protein, and Anthropometry (CIPA) gives positive results when at least one of the following parameters is met: control of food intake for 72 h < 50%, serum albumin < 3 g/dl, body mass index < 18.5 kg/m2 or mid-upper arm circumference ≤ 22.5 cm. This method was validated in comparison with Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in hospitalized patients with non-surgical pathologies. Material and methods: A prospective, longitudinal study was performed on 221 consecutively enrolled patients. Prevalence or risk of malnutrition was estimated with CIPA vs. SGA screening at hospital admission and the concordance (k index – K) between the two methods and their sensitivity (S) and specificity (SP) were studied. Mean length of stay (LOS), mortality, and rate of early readmission were analyzed. Results: The prevalence or risk of malnutrition identified by CIPA and SGA was 35.7% and 23.1%, respectively. K was 0.401 (p < 0.001); S and SP of CIPA vs. SGA were 72.5% and 75.3%, respectively. In contrast to SGA, CIPA-positive patients had an increased mean LOS compared to the negative ones (19.53 vs. 12.63 days, p < 0.001). Both methods detected a major risk of mortality in positive patients, but no difference in early readmission. Conclusions: The CIPA and the SGA screening tools detect patients with a higher risk of mortality, but only CIPA identifies patients with an increased mean LOS. CIPA screening proved valid for use in non-surgical inpatients.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesArchives of Medical Science 2018; 14, 5, pp.1020–1024
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.titleValidity of the new nutrition screening tool Control of Food Intake, Protein, and Anthropometry (CIPA) in non-surgical inpatients
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/aoms.2017.66084
dc.subject.keywordmalnutritionen
dc.subject.keywordhealth care qualityen
dc.subject.keywordscreeningen
dc.subject.keywordinpatienten
dc.subject.keywordnutrition assessment.en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)