Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartín Malagón, Antonio Isaac 
dc.contributor.authorArteaga González, Iván
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Tomassetti Fernández, Eudaldo M.
dc.contributor.authorArranz Durán, Javier
dc.contributor.authorParra Blanco, Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorNicolás Pérez, David
dc.contributor.authorQuintero Carrión, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Luis, Hermógenes
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo Pallarés, Ángel
dc.contributor.otherCirugía
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T21:06:11Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T21:06:11Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn0364-2313
dc.identifier.urihttp://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/41083
dc.descriptionWorld J Surg. 2006 Apr;30(4):605-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0473-3. PMID: 16555023. ISSN: 0364-2313
dc.description.abstractBackground: Endoscopic India ink marking techniques are often used for the intraoperative location of colonic polyps and early stage neoplasms. The aim of this study was to compare how effective this technique is compared with conventional localization methods, as well as its influence on the results of colorectal laparoscopy (LSCRC) for endoscopically advanced tumors. Methods: From January 2003 to January 2005, 47 patients with colorectal carcinomas were included in the study. In one group, lesions were localized preoperatively by endoscopic India ink tattooing (n = 21; tattooed group, TG), while conventional methods were used in the others (n = 26; non-tattooed group, NTG). Patients' perioperative clinical and pathoanatomical data were prospectively collected. Results: Both groups were comparable in age, sex distribution, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index (BMI), technique performed, tumor size and proportion of patients who had previous abdominal surgery. Three patients presented ink spillage without clinical repercussions. Visualization of the correct resection site was higher in the TG (100% vs. 80.8%, P = 0.03). Operative time (147.3 ± 46.2 vs. 187.0 ± 52.7 minutes, P = 0.02) and blood loss (99.3 ± 82.8 vs. 163.6 ± 96.6 cc, P = 0.03) were lower in the TG. There were no differences between groups regarding peristalsis, introduction of oral intake, hospital stay or intra- and postoperative complication rates. No differences were observed amongst pathoanatomical data studied. Conclusions: Preoperative endoscopic tattooing is a safe and effective technique for intraoperative localization of advanced colorectal neoplasms, improving the operative results of LSCRC.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorld Journal of Surgery, (2006) Vol 30, N 4, p. 605-611
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.titleThe use of preoperative endoscopic tattooing in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery for endoscopically advanced tumors: a prospective comparative clinical study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00268-005-0473-3
dc.subject.keywordColorectal Cancer
dc.subject.keywordPreoperative Endoscopic Tattooing


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • DCIRU. Cirugía
    Documentos de investigación (artículos, libros, capítulos de libros, ponencias...) publicados por investigadores del Departamento de Cirugía

Show simple item record

Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)