Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelley, Noah W.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-06T09:42:55Z
dc.date.available2017-10-06T09:42:55Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issne-2530-8343
dc.identifier.issn1131-6810
dc.identifier.urihttp://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/6390
dc.description.abstractThis article seeks to discern the actual benefits and liabilities of Verbal Aspect Theory (VAT) for NT exegesis by examining its application in Ciampa and Rosner’s Commentary on 1 Corinthians. They apply VAT to four primary areas: the explanation of Aktionsart, time and verb tense, present and aorist imperatives, and the perfect tense. The article concludes that a helpful nuance is gained by the use of VAT, though some need for consistency and clarity remains. On the other hand, VAT may at times result in a flattened interpretation of Greek verbs because in some areas VAT provides limited interpretive options that do not always best explain the data.en_EN
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad de La Laguna. Servicio de Publicacioneses_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFortunatae 2016, n. 27, pp. 53-74;
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 internacional)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.titleWhere the Rubber Meets the Road: An Analysis of the Use of Verbal Aspect Theory in Ciampa and Rosner’s Commentary on First Corinthiansen_EN
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 internacional)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 internacional)