RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Timing of rapid cooling and erosional decay of two volcanic islands of the Canary Archipelago: implications from low¿temperature thermochronology.
A1 Mansour, Sherif
A1 Clasmacher, Ulrich A.
A1 Krob, Florian C.
A1 Casillas, Ramón
A1 Albinger, Marie
A2 "Crecimiento submarino émersion de las Islas Canarias: estudio geológico de los Complejos Basales".
"Geología y Vulcanología de Islas Oceánicas".
K1 Low-temperature thermochronology
K1 Fuerteventura
K1 La Gomera
K1 Volcanic island decay
K1 Giant landslides
K1 Time–temperature evolution
AB The Canary Archipelago comprises seven volcanic islands formed by the activity of the Canary mantle anomaly that might have been caused by an ascending plume at the NW-African passive margin. The “Basal Complex (BC)”, which contains the islands pre-shield rock formations, is exposed in the northwest and central Fuerteventura and NW-La Gomera and preserves the archive of giant landslides that caused the removal of most of the shield-stage volcanic rocks. Tools, like low-temperature thermochronology (LTT) are sensitive to rapid cooling activities that accompany landslides. In addition, integrating LTT data with time–temperature (t–T) numerical modelling are a powerful tool for reconstructing the thermo-tectonic evolution as well as defining and quantifying long-term landscape evolution in a variety of geological settings. To unravel part of the long-term landscape evolution of Fuerteventura and La Gomera, zircon and apatite fission-track, and (U–Th)/He data combined with t–T numerical modelling were applied to 39 samples representing the main rock units of the BCs and younger magmatic rocks on both islands. In Fuerteventura, the Northwest and Central Basal Complexes reveal rapid cooling/exhumation of more than 200 °C at ~ 20 Ma. The quantification of the thickness of the rock column using the t–T cooling path would need the knowledge of the palaeo-heat flow. The published thickness of the moved rock column in Fuerteventura and La Gomera does not point to an extreme high heat flow. Therefore, the formation of a giant landslide leads to the removal of ~ 2.0 (± 0.5) km of the volcano rock column. Offshore, such a landslide has led to part of the Puerto Rosario large debris avalanche. The “Central Basal Complex” revealed two more rapid cooling/exhumation events at ~ 16 Ma and ~ 14 Ma that might also be related to landslides. The three landslides might be responsible for the formation of the nowadays Puerto Rosario Debris Avalanche Unit offshore. What might have caused the landslides in Fuerteventura. Age data published provide evidence for magmatic and tectonic activity that occur at the time of the formation of the giant landslides. In addition, the Miocene climate significant changes lead to changes in precipitation, and such changes might also provide a destabilisation of pyroclastic units. Therefore, the causes of the giant landslides might be related to more than only one process. The La Gomera BC has experienced two rapid cooling/exhumation events: the first at ~ 9 Ma, which might have caused ~ 2.0 (± 0.2) km of erosion forming the offshore Tazo avalanche, also known as the Tazo landslide. The second rapid cooling at ~ 8.0 Ma is located at the northwest of the Island and might have been caused by the Garajonay caldera collapse and followed by landslides. The landslides are assumed to have formed the Segments I, II, III, and VIII of the submarine debris avalanches offshore. Like Fuerteventura, both landslides might have been triggered by tectonic and magmatic activities as well as due to variation in precipitation caused by climate variation.
YR 2022
FD 2022
LK http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/35606
UL http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/35606
LA en
DS Repositorio institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna
RD 24-nov-2024