• español
  • English
Universidad de La Laguna
  • Contacto
    • Formulario de contacto
    • Teléfonos
    • riull@ull.es
  • Ayuda y soporte
    • Biblioteca Universitaria
    • Información sobre el Repositorio
    • Subida de documentos
    • Apoyo a la investigación
    • español
    • English
    • español
    • English
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Universidad de La Laguna

Listar

Todo RIULLComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulos

Mi cuenta

Acceder

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Effect of transcranialdirect current stimulation on the right brain temporal area on processing approach and avoidance attitudes with negation

Thumbnail
Ver/Abrir
Exportar Citas
MendeleyRefworks
Compartir
Colecciones
  • Instituto Universitario de Neurociencia
Registro completo
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Padrón González, IvánAutoridad ULL; Nuez, Aaron; Reyes Moreno, Cristian; Marrero Hernández, Hipólito
Fecha
2022
URI
http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/35580
Resumen
Language describes approach/avoidance intentionality by means of attitudinal verbs (e.g., accept vs. reject). The right superior temporal sulcus (rSTS) has been shown to be recruited in processing action goals and approach intentionality in social contexts. In this study, we examine whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of this area improves the processing of attitudinal verbs (either of approach or avoidance) in the context of affirmative and negative sentences [e.g., Julio (did not)/included meat on the grocery list]. After being subjected to tDCS, 46 participants were given sentences for passive reading. Sentences were displayed in segments with a fixed time of exposition, and a verb, either the one mentioned in the sentence or an alternative one was displayed 1,500 ms after the sentence (e.g., included vs. excluded, in the example). Participants were told to read them and then press the space bar to continue the experiment. Results showed shorter latencies for approach verbs that were either mentioned in approach sentences or the alternatives in avoidance sentences, both in affirmative and negative versions under anodal conditions compared to sham conditions. Thus, the anodal stimulation of rSTS affected the accessibility of approach verbs that were not modulated either by being mentioned or by sentence polarity. In addition, mentioned verbs had shorter reading times than the alternative ones in negative sentences in the anodal vs. sham condition. This suggests that stimulation caused an effect of negation in the activation of the mentioned verb. Implications are discussed in the context of the role of the rSTS in processing attitudinal verbs and negation to understand better approach and avoidance mediated by language in the framework of the two-step model of negation processing.
Web ULLTwitterFacebook
Universidad de La Laguna

Universidad de La Laguna

Pabellón de Gobierno, C/ Padre Herrera s/n. | 38200 | Apartado Postal: 456 | San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife - España | Teléfono: (+34) 922 31 90 00