Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMilligan, Sara
dc.contributor.authorAntúnez García, Martín 
dc.contributor.authorBarber Friend, Horacio Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorSchotter, Elizabeth R.
dc.contributor.otherPsicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T21:07:33Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T21:07:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/35586
dc.descriptionMilligan, S., Antúnez, M., Barber, H.A., & Schotter, E.R. (2023). Are Eye Movements and EEG on the Same Page?: A Coregistration Study on Parafoveal Preview and Lexical Frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 152 (1), 188-210. DOI10.1037/xge0001278
dc.description.abstractReaders extract visual and linguistic information not only from fixated words but also upcoming parafoveal words to introduce new input efficiently into the language processing pipeline. The lexical frequency of upcoming words and similarity with subsequent foveal information both influence the amount of time people spend once they fixate the word foveally. However, it is unclear from eye movements alone the extent to which parafoveal word processing, and the integration of that word with foveally obtained information, continues after saccade plans have been initiated. To investigate the underlying neural processes involved in word recognition after saccade planning, we coregistered EEG and eye movements during a gaze-contingent display change paradigm. We orthogonally manipulated the frequency of the parafoveal and foveal words and measured fixation related potentials (FRPs) upon foveal fixation. Eye movements showed primarily an effect of preview frequency, suggesting that saccade planning is based on the familiarity of the parafoveal input. FRPs, on the other hand, demonstrated a disruption in downstream processing when parafoveal and foveal input differed, but only when the parafoveal word was high frequency. These findings demonstrate that lexical processing continues after the eyes have moved away from a word and that eye movements and FRPs provide distinct but complementary accounts about oculomotor behavior and neural processing that cannot be obtained from either method in isolation. Furthermore, these findings put constraints on models of reading by suggesting that lexical processes that occur before an eye movement program is initiated are qualitatively different from those that occur afterward.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 2023
dc.rightsLicencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES
dc.titleAre Eye Movements and EEG on the Same Page?: A Coregistration Study on Parafoveal Preview and Lexical Frequency.
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xge0001278
dc.subject.keywordEye Movements
dc.subject.keywordEEG


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Licencia Creative Commons (Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 Internacional)