RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Beyond the Last Glacial Maximum: Island endemism is best explained by long‐lasting archipelago configurations
A1 Norder, Sietze J.
A1 Proios, Konstantinos
A1 Whittaker, Robert J.
A1 Alonso, María R.
A1 Borges, Paulo A. V.
A1 Borregaard, Michael K.
A1 Cowie, Robert H.
A1 Florens, F. B. Vincent
A1 Frias Martins, António M. de
A1 Ibáñez, Miguel
A1 Kissling, W. Daniel
A1 Nascimento Reyes, Lea de
A1 Otto, Rüdiger
A1 Parent, Christine E.
A1 Rigal, François
A1 Warren, Ben H.
A1 Fernández-Palacios, José María
A1 Loon, E. Emiel van
A1 Triantis, Kostas A.
A1 Rijsdijk, Kenneth F.
K1 Archipelago configuration
K1 Biotic interchange
K1 Endemism
K1 Flowering plants
K1 Glacial–interglacial cycles
K1 Land snails
K1 Late Quaternary
K1 Last environmental change
K1 Sea‐level oscillations
K1 Volcanic oceanic islands
AB Aim: To quantify the influence of past archipelago configuration on present‐day insularbiodiversity patterns, and to compare the role of long‐lasting archipelago configurationsover the Pleistocene to configurations of short duration such as at the LastGlacial Maximum (LGM) and the present-day.Location: 53 volcanic oceanic islands from 12 archipelagos worldwide—Azores,Canary Islands, Cook Islands, Galápagos, Gulf of Guinea, Hawaii, Madeira, Mascarenes,Pitcairn, Revillagigedo, Samoan Islands and Tristan da Cunha.Time period: The last 800 kyr, representing the nine most recent glacial–interglacialcycles.Major taxa studied: Land snails and angiosperms.Methods: Species richness data for land snails and angiosperms were compiled fromexisting literature and species checklists. We reconstructed archipelago configurationsat the following sea levels: the present‐day high interglacial sea level, the intermediatesea levels that are representative of the Pleistocene and the low sea levels ofthe LGM. We fitted two alternative linear mixed models for each archipelago configurationusing the number of single‐island endemic, multiple‐island endemic and (nonendemic)native species as a response. Model performance was assessed based onthe goodness‐of‐fit of the full model, the variance explained by archipelago configurationand model parsimony.Results: Single‐island endemic richness in both taxonomic groups was best explainedby intermediate palaeo‐configuration (positively by area change, and negatively bypalaeo‐connectedness), whereas non‐endemic native species richness was poorly explainedby palaeo‐configuration. Single‐island endemic richness was better explained by intermediate archipelago configurations than by the archipelago configurations ofthe LGM or present‐day
PB Wiley
SN 1466-822X
YR 2018
FD 2018
LK http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/16817
UL http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/16817
LA en
DS Repositorio institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna
RD 02-may-2024